1998 X-Yachts 332 vs Hunter 240 — Comparison
Hunter 240
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1998 X-Yachts 332 | Hunter 240 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | X-Yachts | Hunter |
| Year | 1998–2003 | 1999–2004 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Denmark | USA |
| Designer | Niels Jeppesen | Glenn Henderson |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.06 m (33.0 ft) | 7.32 m (24.0 ft) |
| LWL | 8.69 m (28.5 ft) | 6.17 m (20.2 ft) |
| Beam | 3.13 m (10.3 ft) | 2.44 m (8.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.80 m (5.9 ft) | 1.22 m (4.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 4,700 kg (10,362 lbs) | 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,900 kg (4,189 lbs) | 476 kg (1,049 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 50.5 m² (544 ft²) | 22.5 m² (242 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 18 HP | 8 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 60 L (15.9 gal) | 19 L (5.0 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 120 L (31.7 gal) | 30 L (7.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 4 |
| Cabins | 2 | 1 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1998 X-Yachts 332 and Hunter 240 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1998 X-Yachts 332 is a 1990s design by X-Yachts from Denmark, while the Hunter 240 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1998 X-Yachts 332 was penned by Niels Jeppesen. The Hunter 240 was designed by Glenn Henderson.
In terms of size, the 1998 X-Yachts 332 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.13m, compared to the Hunter 240 at 7.32m (24.0ft) with a 2.44m beam. The 1998 X-Yachts 332 is 2.74m longer than the Hunter 240. The 1998 X-Yachts 332 displaces approximately 245% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1998 X-Yachts 332 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.29 and 50.5 m² of sail area. The Hunter 240, with an SA/D of 18.62 and 22.5 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 240 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1998 X-Yachts 332 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The Hunter 240 has a comfort ratio of 15.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.88. The ballast ratios are 40.4% for the 1998 X-Yachts 332 and 35.0% for the Hunter 240, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1998 X-Yachts 332 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 60L of fuel. The Hunter 240 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 30L water and 19L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1998 X-Yachts 332 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hunter 240 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1998 X-Yachts 332 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1998 X-Yachts 332 · Hunter 240