Hunter 240 vs 1975 Cal 29 — Comparison

Hunter 240Hunter 240
VS
1975 Cal 29

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 2401975 Cal 29
General
ManufacturerHunterCal
Year1999–20041975–1981
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGlenn HendersonBill Lapworth
Dimensions
LOA7.32 m (24.0 ft)8.84 m (29.0 ft)
LWL6.17 m (20.2 ft)7.32 m (24.0 ft)
Beam2.44 m (8.0 ft)2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft1.22 m (4.0 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast476 kg (1,049 lbs)1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area22.5 m² (242 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine8 HP13 HP
Fuel Capacity19 L (5.0 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity30 L (7.9 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths45
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 240
18.62
1975 Cal 29
15.99
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 240
34.97
1975 Cal 29
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 240
0.88
1975 Cal 29
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 240
15.02
1975 Cal 29
20.09

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 240 and 1975 Cal 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 240 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1975 Cal 29 is a 1970s offering from Cal from USA. The Hunter 240 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1975 Cal 29 was designed by Bill Lapworth.

In terms of size, the Hunter 240 measures 7.32m (24.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.44m, compared to the 1975 Cal 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1975 Cal 29 is 1.52m longer than the Hunter 240. The 1975 Cal 29 displaces approximately 133% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 240 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.62 and 22.5 m² of sail area. The 1975 Cal 29, with an SA/D of 15.99 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 240 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 240 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 15.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.88). The 1975 Cal 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 35.0% for the Hunter 240 and 42.9% for the 1975 Cal 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 240 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 30L of water capacity and 19L of fuel. The 1975 Cal 29 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1975 Cal 29 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 240 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1975 Cal 29 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 240 · 1975 Cal 29