Hunter 240 vs 1975 Pearson 28 — Comparison

Hunter 240Hunter 240
VS
1975 Pearson 281975 Pearson 28

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 2401975 Pearson 28
General
ManufacturerHunterPearson
Year1999–20041975–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGlenn HendersonWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA7.32 m (24.0 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL6.17 m (20.2 ft)7.01 m (23.0 ft)
Beam2.44 m (8.0 ft)2.74 m (9.0 ft)
Draft1.22 m (4.0 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Ballast476 kg (1,049 lbs)1,270 kg (2,800 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area22.5 m² (242 ft²)30.0 m² (323 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine8 HP10 HP
Fuel Capacity19 L (5.0 gal)38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity30 L (7.9 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths45
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 240
18.62
1975 Pearson 28
14.83
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 240
34.97
1975 Pearson 28
43.08
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 240
0.88
1975 Pearson 28
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 240
15.02
1975 Pearson 28
21.23

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 240 and 1975 Pearson 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 240 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1975 Pearson 28 is a 1970s offering from Pearson from USA. The Hunter 240 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1975 Pearson 28 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the Hunter 240 measures 7.32m (24.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.44m, compared to the 1975 Pearson 28 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.74m beam. The 1975 Pearson 28 is 1.21m longer than the Hunter 240. The 1975 Pearson 28 displaces approximately 117% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 240 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.62 and 22.5 m² of sail area. The 1975 Pearson 28, with an SA/D of 14.83 and 30.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Hunter 240 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 240 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 15.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.88). The 1975 Pearson 28 has a comfort ratio of 21.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 35.0% for the Hunter 240 and 43.1% for the 1975 Pearson 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 240 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 30L of water capacity and 19L of fuel. The 1975 Pearson 28 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1975 Pearson 28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 240 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1975 Pearson 28 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 240 · 1975 Pearson 28