Hunter 240 vs 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 — Comparison

Hunter 240Hunter 240
VS
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 2401994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
General
ManufacturerHunterHallberg-Rassy
Year1999–20041994–2003
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASweden
DesignerGlenn HendersonOlle Enderlein
Dimensions
LOA7.32 m (24.0 ft)8.85 m (29.0 ft)
LWL6.17 m (20.2 ft)7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam2.44 m (8.0 ft)3.02 m (9.9 ft)
Draft1.22 m (4.0 ft)1.50 m (4.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)3,700 kg (8,157 lbs)
Ballast476 kg (1,049 lbs)1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area22.5 m² (242 ft²)38.0 m² (409 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine8 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity19 L (5.0 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity30 L (7.9 gal)100 L (26.4 gal)
Accommodation
Berths45
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 240
18.62
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
16.14
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 240
34.97
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
40.54
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 240
0.88
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 240
15.02
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
20.16

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 240 and 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 240 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 is a 1990s offering from Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden. The Hunter 240 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 was designed by Olle Enderlein.

In terms of size, the Hunter 240 measures 7.32m (24.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.44m, compared to the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 at 8.85m (29.0ft) with a 3.02m beam. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 is 1.53m longer than the Hunter 240. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 displaces approximately 172% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 240 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.62 and 22.5 m² of sail area. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29, with an SA/D of 16.14 and 38.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 240 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 240 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 15.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.88). The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 35.0% for the Hunter 240 and 40.5% for the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 240 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 30L of water capacity and 19L of fuel. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 100L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 240 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 240 · 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29