Hunter 240 vs 1998 Dehler 29 — Comparison
Hunter 240
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hunter 240 | 1998 Dehler 29 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hunter | Dehler |
| Year | 1999–2004 | 1998–2006 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | Germany |
| Designer | Glenn Henderson | Judel/Vrolijk |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 7.32 m (24.0 ft) | 8.82 m (28.9 ft) |
| LWL | 6.17 m (20.2 ft) | 7.60 m (24.9 ft) |
| Beam | 2.44 m (8.0 ft) | 2.95 m (9.7 ft) |
| Draft | 1.22 m (4.0 ft) | 1.55 m (5.1 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs) | 3,200 kg (7,055 lbs) |
| Ballast | 476 kg (1,049 lbs) | 1,200 kg (2,646 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 22.5 m² (242 ft²) | 35.0 m² (377 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 8 HP | 14 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 19 L (5.0 gal) | 40 L (10.6 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 30 L (7.9 gal) | 80 L (21.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 4 | 5 |
| Cabins | 1 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hunter 240 and 1998 Dehler 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 240 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1998 Dehler 29 is a 1990s offering from Dehler from Germany. The Hunter 240 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1998 Dehler 29 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.
In terms of size, the Hunter 240 measures 7.32m (24.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.44m, compared to the 1998 Dehler 29 at 8.82m (28.9ft) with a 2.95m beam. The 1998 Dehler 29 is 1.50m longer than the Hunter 240. The 1998 Dehler 29 displaces approximately 135% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hunter 240 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.62 and 22.5 m² of sail area. The 1998 Dehler 29, with an SA/D of 16.38 and 35.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 240 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hunter 240 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 15.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.88). The 1998 Dehler 29 has a comfort ratio of 18.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.80. The ballast ratios are 35.0% for the Hunter 240 and 37.5% for the 1998 Dehler 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hunter 240 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 30L of water capacity and 19L of fuel. The 1998 Dehler 29 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 80L water and 40L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1998 Dehler 29 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hunter 240 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1998 Dehler 29 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Hunter 240 · 1998 Dehler 29