Hunter 306 vs 1990 Valiant 39 — Comparison

Hunter 306Hunter 306
VS
1990 Valiant 39

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 3061990 Valiant 39
General
ManufacturerHunterValiant
Year1999–20041990–2000
TypeSloopCutter
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGlenn HendersonBob Perry
Dimensions
LOA9.25 m (30.3 ft)11.89 m (39.0 ft)
LWL8.08 m (26.5 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.10 m (10.2 ft)3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft1.65 m (5.4 ft)1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,990 kg (8,796 lbs)8,618 kg (18,999 lbs)
Ballast1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)3,447 kg (7,599 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area43.0 m² (463 ft²)66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinModified full
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)303 L (80.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 306
17.37
1990 Valiant 39
15.95
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 306
39.80
1990 Valiant 39
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 306
0.78
1990 Valiant 39
0.70
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 306
19.11
1990 Valiant 39
23.54

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 306 and 1990 Valiant 39 represent different approaches to sailboat design. The Hunter 306 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1990 Valiant 39 is a 1990s offering from Valiant from USA. The Hunter 306 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1990 Valiant 39 was designed by Bob Perry.

In terms of size, the Hunter 306 measures 9.25m (30.3ft) overall with a beam of 3.10m, compared to the 1990 Valiant 39 at 11.89m (39.0ft) with a 3.56m beam. The 1990 Valiant 39 is 2.64m longer than the Hunter 306. The 1990 Valiant 39 displaces approximately 116% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 306 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.37 and 43.0 m² of sail area. The 1990 Valiant 39, with an SA/D of 15.95 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 306 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 306 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1990 Valiant 39 has a comfort ratio of 23.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.70. The ballast ratios are 39.8% for the Hunter 306 and 40.0% for the 1990 Valiant 39, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 306 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1990 Valiant 39 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 303L water and 170L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Valiant 39 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 306 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1990 Valiant 39 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 306 · 1990 Valiant 39