1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 vs 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 — Comparison

1999 Pacific Seacraft 40
VS
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 321990 Wauquiez Centurion 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1999 Pacific Seacraft 401990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
General
ManufacturerPacific SeacraftWauquiez
Year1999–20071990–1998
TypeCutterSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerWilliam CrealockJean-Marie Finot
Dimensions
LOA12.19 m (40.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL9.75 m (32.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.66 m (12.0 ft)3.15 m (10.3 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.65 m (5.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,525 kg (20,999 lbs)4,500 kg (9,921 lbs)
Ballast3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)1,800 kg (3,968 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area70.0 m² (754 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)65 L (17.2 gal)
Water Capacity340 L (89.8 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths75
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1999 Pacific Seacraft 40
15.83
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
15.66
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1999 Pacific Seacraft 40
40.48
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1999 Pacific Seacraft 40
0.69
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1999 Pacific Seacraft 40
23.66
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
19.88

Detailed Comparison

The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 and 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 represent different approaches to sailboat design. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 is a 1990s design by Pacific Seacraft from USA, while the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 is a 1990s offering from Wauquiez from France. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 was penned by William Crealock. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 was designed by Jean-Marie Finot.

In terms of size, the 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 measures 12.19m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.66m, compared to the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.15m beam. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 is 2.44m longer than the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 displaces approximately 112% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.83 and 70.0 m² of sail area. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32, with an SA/D of 15.66 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.69). The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 has a comfort ratio of 19.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 40.5% for the 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 and 40.0% for the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 340L of water capacity and 189L of fuel. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 65L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1999 Pacific Seacraft 40 · 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32