2000 Catalina 470 vs 1996 Moody 45 — Comparison

2000 Catalina 470
VS
1996 Moody 451996 Moody 45

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2000 Catalina 4701996 Moody 45
General
ManufacturerCatalinaMoody
Year2000–20081996–2002
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerGerry DouglasBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA14.33 m (47.0 ft)13.72 m (45.0 ft)
LWL12.19 m (40.0 ft)11.50 m (37.7 ft)
Beam4.24 m (13.9 ft)4.22 m (13.8 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement13,154 kg (29,000 lbs)12,500 kg (27,558 lbs)
Ballast5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)4,900 kg (10,803 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area89.6 m² (964 ft²)85.0 m² (915 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity227 L (60.0 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Water Capacity454 L (119.9 gal)450 L (118.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths88
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2000 Catalina 470
16.33
1996 Moody 45
16.03
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2000 Catalina 470
41.38
1996 Moody 45
39.20
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2000 Catalina 470
0.72
1996 Moody 45
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2000 Catalina 470
17.92
1996 Moody 45
19.06

Detailed Comparison

The 2000 Catalina 470 and 1996 Moody 45 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Catalina 470 is a 2000s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1996 Moody 45 is a 1990s offering from Moody from UK. The 2000 Catalina 470 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1996 Moody 45 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 2000 Catalina 470 measures 14.33m (47.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.24m, compared to the 1996 Moody 45 at 13.72m (45.0ft) with a 4.22m beam. The 2000 Catalina 470 is 0.61m longer than the 1996 Moody 45. The 2000 Catalina 470 displaces approximately 5% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2000 Catalina 470 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.33 and 89.6 m² of sail area. The 1996 Moody 45, with an SA/D of 16.03 and 85.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2000 Catalina 470 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2000 Catalina 470 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 1996 Moody 45 has a comfort ratio of 19.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 41.4% for the 2000 Catalina 470 and 39.2% for the 1996 Moody 45, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2000 Catalina 470 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 454L of water capacity and 227L of fuel. The 1996 Moody 45 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 450L water and 250L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1996 Moody 45 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2000 Catalina 470 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2000 Catalina 470 · 1996 Moody 45