2000 Catalina 470 vs 2013 Moody 54 — Comparison

2000 Catalina 470
VS
2013 Moody 542013 Moody 54

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2000 Catalina 4702013 Moody 54
General
ManufacturerCatalinaMoody
Year2000–20082013–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerGerry DouglasBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA14.33 m (47.0 ft)16.18 m (53.1 ft)
LWL12.19 m (40.0 ft)14.50 m (47.6 ft)
Beam4.24 m (13.9 ft)4.90 m (16.1 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)2.15 m (7.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement13,154 kg (29,000 lbs)21,000 kg (46,297 lbs)
Ballast5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)7,500 kg (16,535 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area89.6 m² (964 ft²)125.0 m² (1,346 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP110 HP
Fuel Capacity227 L (60.0 gal)450 L (118.9 gal)
Water Capacity454 L (119.9 gal)700 L (184.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths88
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2000 Catalina 470
16.33
2013 Moody 54
16.68
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2000 Catalina 470
41.38
2013 Moody 54
35.71
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2000 Catalina 470
0.72
2013 Moody 54
0.71
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2000 Catalina 470
17.92
2013 Moody 54
17.25

Detailed Comparison

The 2000 Catalina 470 and 2013 Moody 54 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Catalina 470 is a 2000s design by Catalina from USA, while the 2013 Moody 54 is a modern offering from Moody from Germany. The 2000 Catalina 470 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 2013 Moody 54 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 2000 Catalina 470 measures 14.33m (47.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.24m, compared to the 2013 Moody 54 at 16.18m (53.1ft) with a 4.90m beam. The 2013 Moody 54 is 1.85m longer than the 2000 Catalina 470. The 2013 Moody 54 displaces approximately 60% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2000 Catalina 470 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.33 and 89.6 m² of sail area. The 2013 Moody 54, with an SA/D of 16.68 and 125.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2013 Moody 54 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2000 Catalina 470 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 2013 Moody 54 has a comfort ratio of 17.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 41.4% for the 2000 Catalina 470 and 35.7% for the 2013 Moody 54, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2000 Catalina 470 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 454L of water capacity and 227L of fuel. The 2013 Moody 54 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 700L water and 450L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Catalina 470 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Moody 54 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2000 Catalina 470 · 2013 Moody 54