2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 vs 1982 Westerly Konsort — Comparison

2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
VS
1982 Westerly Konsort1982 Westerly Konsort

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2000 Hallberg-Rassy 311982 Westerly Konsort
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyWesterly
Year2000–20101982–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUK
DesignerGerman FrersEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA9.47 m (31.1 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
LWL8.25 m (27.1 ft)7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam3.18 m (10.4 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.60 m (5.2 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area44.5 m² (479 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity140 L (37.0 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
16.35
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
40.22
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
0.77
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
20.39
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75

Detailed Comparison

The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 and 1982 Westerly Konsort represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is a 2000s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 was penned by German Frers. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 measures 9.47m (31.1ft) overall with a beam of 3.18m, compared to the 1982 Westerly Konsort at 9.50m (31.2ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1982 Westerly Konsort is 0.03m longer than the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 displaces approximately 1% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.35 and 44.5 m² of sail area. The 1982 Westerly Konsort, with an SA/D of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1982 Westerly Konsort has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.2% for the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 and 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 140L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 · 1982 Westerly Konsort