2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 vs 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 — Comparison

2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
VS
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2000 Hallberg-Rassy 311986 Pacific Seacraft 25
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyPacific Seacraft
Year2000–20101986–2007
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUSA
DesignerGerman FrersWilliam Crealock
Dimensions
LOA9.47 m (31.1 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
LWL8.25 m (27.1 ft)5.94 m (19.5 ft)
Beam3.18 m (10.4 ft)2.44 m (8.0 ft)
Draft1.60 m (5.2 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Ballast1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)953 kg (2,101 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area44.5 m² (479 ft²)24.0 m² (258 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP10 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)30 L (7.9 gal)
Water Capacity140 L (37.0 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths54
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
16.35
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
14.13
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
40.22
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
42.02
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
0.77
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
20.39
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
25.59

Detailed Comparison

The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 and 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is a 2000s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 was penned by German Frers. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 measures 9.47m (31.1ft) overall with a beam of 3.18m, compared to the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 at 7.62m (25.0ft) with a 2.44m beam. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is 1.85m longer than the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 displaces approximately 103% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.35 and 44.5 m² of sail area. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25, with an SA/D of 14.13 and 24.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 has a comfort ratio of 25.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.2% for the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 and 42.0% for the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 140L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 30L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 · 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25