2000 Island Packet 38 vs 1982 Cape Dory 36 — Comparison
1982 Cape Dory 36
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2000 Island Packet 38 | 1982 Cape Dory 36 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Island Packet | Cape Dory |
| Year | 2000–2008 | 1982–1990 |
| Type | Cutter | Cutter |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Bob Johnson | Carl Alberg |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 11.58 m (38.0 ft) | 10.97 m (36.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.75 m (32.0 ft) | 8.69 m (28.5 ft) |
| Beam | 3.72 m (12.2 ft) | 3.28 m (10.8 ft) |
| Draft | 1.37 m (4.5 ft) | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 8,618 kg (18,999 lbs) | 6,804 kg (15,000 lbs) |
| Ballast | 3,447 kg (7,599 lbs) | 2,722 kg (6,001 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 60.5 m² (651 ft²) | 55.5 m² (597 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Full | Full |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 40 HP | 28 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 189 L (49.9 gal) | 114 L (30.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 340 L (89.8 gal) | 189 L (49.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2000 Island Packet 38 and 1982 Cape Dory 36 represent two takes on cutter-rigged sailing. The 2000 Island Packet 38 is a 2000s design by Island Packet from USA, while the 1982 Cape Dory 36 is a 1980s offering from Cape Dory from USA. The 2000 Island Packet 38 was penned by Bob Johnson. The 1982 Cape Dory 36 was designed by Carl Alberg.
In terms of size, the 2000 Island Packet 38 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the 1982 Cape Dory 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.28m beam. The 2000 Island Packet 38 is 0.61m longer than the 1982 Cape Dory 36. The 2000 Island Packet 38 displaces approximately 27% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2000 Island Packet 38 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.62 and 60.5 m² of sail area. The 1982 Cape Dory 36, with an SA/D of 15.70 and 55.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1982 Cape Dory 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2000 Island Packet 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 1982 Cape Dory 36 has a comfort ratio of 24.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.69. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 2000 Island Packet 38 and 40.0% for the 1982 Cape Dory 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2000 Island Packet 38 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 340L of water capacity and 189L of fuel. The 1982 Cape Dory 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 114L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1982 Cape Dory 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1982 Cape Dory 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 2000 Island Packet 38 · 1982 Cape Dory 36