2000 Island Packet 38 vs 2006 Island Packet 420 — Comparison

2000 Island Packet 38
VS
2006 Island Packet 420

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2000 Island Packet 382006 Island Packet 420
General
ManufacturerIsland PacketIsland Packet
Year2000–20082006–2012
TypeCutterCutter
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerBob JohnsonBob Johnson
Dimensions
LOA11.58 m (38.0 ft)12.80 m (42.0 ft)
LWL9.75 m (32.0 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
Beam3.72 m (12.2 ft)3.96 m (13.0 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.42 m (4.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,618 kg (18,999 lbs)10,886 kg (23,999 lbs)
Ballast3,447 kg (7,599 lbs)4,309 kg (9,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area60.5 m² (651 ft²)72.0 m² (775 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Water Capacity340 L (89.8 gal)454 L (119.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2000 Island Packet 38
14.62
2006 Island Packet 420
14.89
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2000 Island Packet 38
40.00
2006 Island Packet 420
39.58
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2000 Island Packet 38
0.73
2006 Island Packet 420
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2000 Island Packet 38
21.70
2006 Island Packet 420
20.16

Detailed Comparison

The 2000 Island Packet 38 and 2006 Island Packet 420 represent two takes on cutter-rigged sailing. The 2000 Island Packet 38 is a 2000s design by Island Packet from USA, while the 2006 Island Packet 420 is a 2000s offering from Island Packet from USA. The 2000 Island Packet 38 was penned by Bob Johnson. The 2006 Island Packet 420 was designed by Bob Johnson.

In terms of size, the 2000 Island Packet 38 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the 2006 Island Packet 420 at 12.80m (42.0ft) with a 3.96m beam. The 2006 Island Packet 420 is 1.22m longer than the 2000 Island Packet 38. The 2006 Island Packet 420 displaces approximately 26% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2000 Island Packet 38 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.62 and 60.5 m² of sail area. The 2006 Island Packet 420, with an SA/D of 14.89 and 72.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2006 Island Packet 420 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2000 Island Packet 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 2006 Island Packet 420 has a comfort ratio of 20.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 2000 Island Packet 38 and 39.6% for the 2006 Island Packet 420, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2000 Island Packet 38 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 340L of water capacity and 189L of fuel. The 2006 Island Packet 420 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 454L water and 227L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Island Packet 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2006 Island Packet 420 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2006 Island Packet 420 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2000 Island Packet 38 · 2006 Island Packet 420