2000 Sabre 386 vs 1987 Cape Dory 40 — Comparison
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2000 Sabre 386 | 1987 Cape Dory 40 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Sabre | Cape Dory |
| Year | 2000–2007 | 1987–1992 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Jim Taylor | Carl Alberg |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 11.58 m (38.0 ft) | 12.19 m (40.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.75 m (32.0 ft) | 9.45 m (31.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.56 m (11.7 ft) | 3.66 m (12.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.75 m (5.7 ft) | 1.68 m (5.5 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 7,257 kg (15,999 lbs) | 8,618 kg (18,999 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs) | 3,629 kg (8,001 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 60.5 m² (651 ft²) | 64.5 m² (694 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Full |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 35 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 114 L (30.1 gal) | 151 L (39.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 189 L (49.9 gal) | 284 L (75.0 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 7 | 7 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2000 Sabre 386 and 1987 Cape Dory 40 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Sabre 386 is a 2000s design by Sabre from USA, while the 1987 Cape Dory 40 is a 1980s offering from Cape Dory from USA. The 2000 Sabre 386 was penned by Jim Taylor. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 was designed by Carl Alberg.
In terms of size, the 2000 Sabre 386 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.56m, compared to the 1987 Cape Dory 40 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 is 0.61m longer than the 2000 Sabre 386. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 displaces approximately 19% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2000 Sabre 386 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of sail area. The 1987 Cape Dory 40, with an SA/D of 15.59 and 64.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2000 Sabre 386 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2000 Sabre 386 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1987 Cape Dory 40 has a comfort ratio of 22.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 40.6% for the 2000 Sabre 386 and 42.1% for the 1987 Cape Dory 40, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2000 Sabre 386 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 284L water and 151L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1987 Cape Dory 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2000 Sabre 386 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 2000 Sabre 386 · 1987 Cape Dory 40