Bavaria 40 vs 1992 Moody 41 — Comparison
Bavaria 40
1992 Moody 41
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Bavaria 40 | 1992 Moody 41 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Bavaria | Moody |
| Year | 2001–2006 | 1992–1998 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Germany | UK |
| Designer | J&J Design | Bill Dixon |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 12.35 m (40.5 ft) | 12.50 m (41.0 ft) |
| LWL | 10.75 m (35.3 ft) | 10.36 m (34.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.99 m (13.1 ft) | 3.86 m (12.7 ft) |
| Draft | 1.90 m (6.2 ft) | 1.70 m (5.6 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 8,500 kg (18,739 lbs) | 9,800 kg (21,605 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,600 kg (5,732 lbs) | 3,800 kg (8,378 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 72.0 m² (775 ft²) | 70.0 m² (754 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 40 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 160 L (42.3 gal) | 180 L (47.6 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 300 L (79.3 gal) | 360 L (95.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 8 | 7 |
| Cabins | 3 | 3 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Bavaria 40 and 1992 Moody 41 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Bavaria 40 is a 2000s design by Bavaria from Germany, while the 1992 Moody 41 is a 1990s offering from Moody from UK. The Bavaria 40 was penned by J&J Design. The 1992 Moody 41 was designed by Bill Dixon.
In terms of size, the Bavaria 40 measures 12.35m (40.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.99m, compared to the 1992 Moody 41 at 12.50m (41.0ft) with a 3.86m beam. The 1992 Moody 41 is 0.15m longer than the Bavaria 40. The 1992 Moody 41 displaces approximately 15% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Bavaria 40 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.56 and 72.0 m² of sail area. The 1992 Moody 41, with an SA/D of 15.53 and 70.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Bavaria 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Bavaria 40 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1992 Moody 41 has a comfort ratio of 20.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 30.6% for the Bavaria 40 and 38.8% for the 1992 Moody 41, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Bavaria 40 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 300L of water capacity and 160L of fuel. The 1992 Moody 41 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 360L water and 180L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1992 Moody 41 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Bavaria 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The Bavaria 40 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Bavaria 40 · 1992 Moody 41