Hunter 450 vs 1992 Moody 41 — Comparison

Hunter 450
VS
1992 Moody 411992 Moody 41

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 4501992 Moody 41
General
ManufacturerHunterMoody
Year2001–20061992–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerGlenn HendersonBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA13.72 m (45.0 ft)12.50 m (41.0 ft)
LWL11.89 m (39.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
Beam4.27 m (14.0 ft)3.86 m (12.7 ft)
Draft2.06 m (6.8 ft)1.70 m (5.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement10,886 kg (23,999 lbs)9,800 kg (21,605 lbs)
Ballast4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)3,800 kg (8,378 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area86.0 m² (926 ft²)70.0 m² (754 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine75 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)180 L (47.6 gal)
Water Capacity341 L (90.1 gal)360 L (95.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths87
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 450
17.79
1992 Moody 41
15.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 450
37.50
1992 Moody 41
38.78
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 450
0.77
1992 Moody 41
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 450
15.63
1992 Moody 41
20.58

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 450 and 1992 Moody 41 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 450 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1992 Moody 41 is a 1990s offering from Moody from UK. The Hunter 450 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1992 Moody 41 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the Hunter 450 measures 13.72m (45.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.27m, compared to the 1992 Moody 41 at 12.50m (41.0ft) with a 3.86m beam. The Hunter 450 is 1.22m longer than the 1992 Moody 41. The Hunter 450 displaces approximately 11% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 450 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.79 and 86.0 m² of sail area. The 1992 Moody 41, with an SA/D of 15.53 and 70.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 450 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 450 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 15.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1992 Moody 41 has a comfort ratio of 20.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 37.5% for the Hunter 450 and 38.8% for the 1992 Moody 41, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 450 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 341L of water capacity and 189L of fuel. The 1992 Moody 41 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 360L water and 180L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1992 Moody 41 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 450 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hunter 450 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 450 · 1992 Moody 41