Hunter 450 vs 1998 Feeling 44 — Comparison

Hunter 450
VS
1998 Feeling 44

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 4501998 Feeling 44
General
ManufacturerHunterFeeling
Year2001–20061998–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerGlenn HendersonPhilippe Harlé / Mortain & Mavrikios
Dimensions
LOA13.72 m (45.0 ft)13.41 m (44.0 ft)
LWL11.89 m (39.0 ft)11.50 m (37.7 ft)
Beam4.27 m (14.0 ft)4.10 m (13.5 ft)
Draft2.06 m (6.8 ft)1.90 m (6.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement10,886 kg (23,999 lbs)10,500 kg (23,149 lbs)
Ballast4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)4,000 kg (8,818 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area86.0 m² (926 ft²)82.0 m² (883 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine75 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Water Capacity341 L (90.1 gal)400 L (105.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths88
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 450
17.79
1998 Feeling 44
17.37
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 450
37.50
1998 Feeling 44
38.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 450
0.77
1998 Feeling 44
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 450
15.63
1998 Feeling 44
16.90

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 450 and 1998 Feeling 44 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 450 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1998 Feeling 44 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The Hunter 450 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1998 Feeling 44 was designed by Philippe Harlé / Mortain & Mavrikios.

In terms of size, the Hunter 450 measures 13.72m (45.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.27m, compared to the 1998 Feeling 44 at 13.41m (44.0ft) with a 4.10m beam. The Hunter 450 is 0.31m longer than the 1998 Feeling 44. The Hunter 450 displaces approximately 4% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 450 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.79 and 86.0 m² of sail area. The 1998 Feeling 44, with an SA/D of 17.37 and 82.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 450 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 450 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 15.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1998 Feeling 44 has a comfort ratio of 16.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 37.5% for the Hunter 450 and 38.1% for the 1998 Feeling 44, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 450 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 341L of water capacity and 189L of fuel. The 1998 Feeling 44 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 400L water and 200L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1998 Feeling 44 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 450 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 450 · 1998 Feeling 44