2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 vs 2017 Dehler 46 — Comparison

2002 Hallberg-Rassy 462002 Hallberg-Rassy 46
VS
2017 Dehler 462017 Dehler 46

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2002 Hallberg-Rassy 462017 Dehler 46
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyDehler
Year2002–20122017
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenGermany
DesignerGerman FrersJudel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA14.05 m (46.1 ft)14.10 m (46.3 ft)
LWL11.70 m (38.4 ft)12.80 m (42.0 ft)
Beam4.20 m (13.8 ft)4.20 m (13.8 ft)
Draft2.10 m (6.9 ft)2.30 m (7.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement13,000 kg (28,660 lbs)10,500 kg (23,149 lbs)
Ballast5,000 kg (11,023 lbs)3,500 kg (7,716 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area91.0 m² (980 ft²)96.0 m² (1,033 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine75 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity300 L (79.3 gal)130 L (34.3 gal)
Water Capacity600 L (158.5 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths78
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46
16.72
2017 Dehler 46
20.34
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46
38.46
2017 Dehler 46
33.33
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46
0.72
2017 Dehler 46
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46
19.19
2017 Dehler 46
13.71

Detailed Comparison

The 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 and 2017 Dehler 46 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 is a 2000s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 2017 Dehler 46 is a modern offering from Dehler from Germany. The 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 was penned by German Frers. The 2017 Dehler 46 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 measures 14.05m (46.1ft) overall with a beam of 4.20m, compared to the 2017 Dehler 46 at 14.10m (46.3ft) with a 4.20m beam. The 2017 Dehler 46 is 0.05m longer than the 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46. The 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 displaces approximately 24% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.72 and 91.0 m² of sail area. The 2017 Dehler 46, with an SA/D of 20.34 and 96.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 2017 Dehler 46 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 2017 Dehler 46 has a comfort ratio of 13.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 38.5% for the 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 and 33.3% for the 2017 Dehler 46, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 600L of water capacity and 300L of fuel. The 2017 Dehler 46 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 130L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2017 Dehler 46 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2017 Dehler 46 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 · 2017 Dehler 46