2002 X-Yachts X-37 vs 1983 Pearson 31 — Comparison

2002 X-Yachts X-37
VS
1983 Pearson 311983 Pearson 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2002 X-Yachts X-371983 Pearson 31
General
ManufacturerX-YachtsPearson
Year2002–20081983–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryDenmarkUSA
DesignerNiels JeppesenWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA11.15 m (36.6 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL9.75 m (32.0 ft)7.77 m (25.5 ft)
Beam3.42 m (11.2 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft2.15 m (7.1 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,500 kg (14,330 lbs)4,309 kg (9,500 lbs)
Ballast2,500 kg (5,512 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area62.0 m² (667 ft²)40.0 m² (431 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2002 X-Yachts X-37
18.09
1983 Pearson 31
15.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2002 X-Yachts X-37
38.46
1983 Pearson 31
42.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2002 X-Yachts X-37
0.73
1983 Pearson 31
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2002 X-Yachts X-37
18.77
1983 Pearson 31
21.43

Detailed Comparison

The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 and 1983 Pearson 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 is a 2000s design by X-Yachts from Denmark, while the 1983 Pearson 31 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 was penned by Niels Jeppesen. The 1983 Pearson 31 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 2002 X-Yachts X-37 measures 11.15m (36.6ft) overall with a beam of 3.42m, compared to the 1983 Pearson 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 is 1.70m longer than the 1983 Pearson 31. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 displaces approximately 51% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2002 X-Yachts X-37 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.09 and 62.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Pearson 31, with an SA/D of 15.35 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2002 X-Yachts X-37 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 1983 Pearson 31 has a comfort ratio of 21.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 38.5% for the 2002 X-Yachts X-37 and 42.1% for the 1983 Pearson 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2002 X-Yachts X-37 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1983 Pearson 31 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Pearson 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2002 X-Yachts X-37 · 1983 Pearson 31