2002 X-Yachts X-37 vs 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 — Comparison

2002 X-Yachts X-37
VS
2013 Beneteau Figaro 32013 Beneteau Figaro 3

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2002 X-Yachts X-372013 Beneteau Figaro 3
General
ManufacturerX-YachtsBeneteau
Year2002–20082013
TypeSloopSloop
CountryDenmarkFrance
DesignerNiels JeppesenVPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost
Dimensions
LOA11.15 m (36.6 ft)10.10 m (33.1 ft)
LWL9.75 m (32.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.42 m (11.2 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft2.15 m (7.1 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,500 kg (14,330 lbs)3,450 kg (7,606 lbs)
Ballast2,500 kg (5,512 lbs)1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area62.0 m² (667 ft²)65.0 m² (700 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)40 L (10.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths62
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2002 X-Yachts X-37
18.09
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
28.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2002 X-Yachts X-37
38.46
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
43.48
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2002 X-Yachts X-37
0.73
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
0.90
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2002 X-Yachts X-37
18.77
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
11.16

Detailed Comparison

The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 and 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 is a 2000s design by X-Yachts from Denmark, while the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 was penned by Niels Jeppesen. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 was designed by VPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost.

In terms of size, the 2002 X-Yachts X-37 measures 11.15m (36.6ft) overall with a beam of 3.42m, compared to the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 at 10.10m (33.1ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 is 1.05m longer than the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3. The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 displaces approximately 88% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2002 X-Yachts X-37 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.09 and 62.0 m² of sail area. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, with an SA/D of 28.93 and 65.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2002 X-Yachts X-37 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has a comfort ratio of 11.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.90. The ballast ratios are 38.5% for the 2002 X-Yachts X-37 and 43.5% for the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2002 X-Yachts X-37 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 offers 2 berths in 1 cabin with 40L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2002 X-Yachts X-37 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2002 X-Yachts X-37 · 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3