Bavaria 42 vs 1996 Moody 45 — Comparison
Bavaria 42
1996 Moody 45
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Bavaria 42 | 1996 Moody 45 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Bavaria | Moody |
| Year | 2003–2008 | 1996–2002 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Germany | UK |
| Designer | J&J Design | Bill Dixon |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 12.99 m (42.6 ft) | 13.72 m (45.0 ft) |
| LWL | 11.29 m (37.0 ft) | 11.50 m (37.7 ft) |
| Beam | 4.06 m (13.3 ft) | 4.22 m (13.8 ft) |
| Draft | 1.95 m (6.4 ft) | 1.80 m (5.9 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 9,300 kg (20,503 lbs) | 12,500 kg (27,558 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,900 kg (6,393 lbs) | 4,900 kg (10,803 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 79.0 m² (850 ft²) | 85.0 m² (915 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 55 HP | 55 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 200 L (52.8 gal) | 250 L (66.0 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 350 L (92.5 gal) | 450 L (118.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 8 | 8 |
| Cabins | 3 | 3 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Bavaria 42 and 1996 Moody 45 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Bavaria 42 is a 2000s design by Bavaria from Germany, while the 1996 Moody 45 is a 1990s offering from Moody from UK. The Bavaria 42 was penned by J&J Design. The 1996 Moody 45 was designed by Bill Dixon.
In terms of size, the Bavaria 42 measures 12.99m (42.6ft) overall with a beam of 4.06m, compared to the 1996 Moody 45 at 13.72m (45.0ft) with a 4.22m beam. The 1996 Moody 45 is 0.73m longer than the Bavaria 42. The 1996 Moody 45 displaces approximately 34% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Bavaria 42 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.15 and 79.0 m² of sail area. The 1996 Moody 45, with an SA/D of 16.03 and 85.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Bavaria 42 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Bavaria 42 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 15.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1996 Moody 45 has a comfort ratio of 19.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 31.2% for the Bavaria 42 and 39.2% for the 1996 Moody 45, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Bavaria 42 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 350L of water capacity and 200L of fuel. The 1996 Moody 45 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 450L water and 250L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1996 Moody 45 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Bavaria 42 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Bavaria 42 · 1996 Moody 45