2003 Catalina 310 vs Hunter 306 — Comparison

2003 Catalina 3102003 Catalina 310
VS
Hunter 306Hunter 306

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2003 Catalina 310Hunter 306
General
ManufacturerCatalinaHunter
Year2003–20071999–2004
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA9.45 m (31.0 ft)9.25 m (30.3 ft)
LWL8.38 m (27.5 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam3.30 m (10.8 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.65 m (5.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)3,990 kg (8,796 lbs)
Ballast1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area45.3 m² (488 ft²)43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2003 Catalina 310
16.80
Hunter 306
17.37
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2003 Catalina 310
39.99
Hunter 306
39.80
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2003 Catalina 310
0.80
Hunter 306
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2003 Catalina 310
18.77
Hunter 306
19.11

Detailed Comparison

The 2003 Catalina 310 and Hunter 306 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2003 Catalina 310 is a 2000s design by Catalina from USA, while the Hunter 306 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 2003 Catalina 310 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The Hunter 306 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 2003 Catalina 310 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.30m, compared to the Hunter 306 at 9.25m (30.3ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 2003 Catalina 310 is 0.20m longer than the Hunter 306. The 2003 Catalina 310 displaces approximately 14% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2003 Catalina 310 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.80 and 45.3 m² of sail area. The Hunter 306, with an SA/D of 17.37 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 306 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2003 Catalina 310 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The Hunter 306 has a comfort ratio of 19.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 2003 Catalina 310 and 39.8% for the Hunter 306, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2003 Catalina 310 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The Hunter 306 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hunter 306 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 306 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2003 Catalina 310 · Hunter 306