Catalina 42 MkII vs Hunter 450 — Comparison
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Catalina 42 MkII | Hunter 450 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Catalina | Hunter |
| Year | 2003–2009 | 2001–2006 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Gerry Douglas | Glenn Henderson |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 12.80 m (42.0 ft) | 13.72 m (45.0 ft) |
| LWL | 11.10 m (36.4 ft) | 11.89 m (39.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.96 m (13.0 ft) | 4.27 m (14.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.85 m (6.1 ft) | 2.06 m (6.8 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 9,525 kg (20,999 lbs) | 10,886 kg (23,999 lbs) |
| Ballast | 3,629 kg (8,001 lbs) | 4,082 kg (8,999 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 76.0 m² (818 ft²) | 86.0 m² (926 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 55 HP | 75 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 152 L (40.2 gal) | 189 L (49.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 303 L (80.0 gal) | 341 L (90.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 7 | 8 |
| Cabins | 2 | 3 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Catalina 42 MkII and Hunter 450 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 42 MkII is a 2000s design by Catalina from USA, while the Hunter 450 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The Catalina 42 MkII was penned by Gerry Douglas. The Hunter 450 was designed by Glenn Henderson.
In terms of size, the Catalina 42 MkII measures 12.80m (42.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.96m, compared to the Hunter 450 at 13.72m (45.0ft) with a 4.27m beam. The Hunter 450 is 0.92m longer than the Catalina 42 MkII. The Hunter 450 displaces approximately 14% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Catalina 42 MkII has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.18 and 76.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 450, with an SA/D of 17.79 and 86.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 450 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Catalina 42 MkII offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The Hunter 450 has a comfort ratio of 15.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 38.1% for the Catalina 42 MkII and 37.5% for the Hunter 450, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Catalina 42 MkII provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 152L of fuel. The Hunter 450 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 341L water and 189L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The Catalina 42 MkII is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hunter 450 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The Hunter 450 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Catalina 42 MkII · Hunter 450