Hunter 212 vs 1982 Freedom 28 — Comparison

Hunter 212Hunter 212
VS
1982 Freedom 281982 Freedom 28

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 2121982 Freedom 28
General
ManufacturerHunterFreedom
Year2003–20081982–1988
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGlenn HendersonGarry Hoyt
Dimensions
LOA6.35 m (20.8 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL5.56 m (18.2 ft)7.01 m (23.0 ft)
Beam2.26 m (7.4 ft)2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft0.99 m (3.2 ft)1.14 m (3.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement680 kg (1,499 lbs)2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Ballast168 kg (370 lbs)907 kg (2,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area16.0 m² (172 ft²)29.0 m² (312 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeCenterboardFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine4 HP10 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity15 L (4.0 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths35
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 212
21.04
1982 Freedom 28
16.02
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 212
24.71
1982 Freedom 28
36.35
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 212
1.03
1982 Freedom 28
0.84
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 212
10.50
1982 Freedom 28
17.13

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 212 and 1982 Freedom 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 212 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1982 Freedom 28 is a 1980s offering from Freedom from USA. The Hunter 212 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1982 Freedom 28 was designed by Garry Hoyt.

In terms of size, the Hunter 212 measures 6.35m (20.8ft) overall with a beam of 2.26m, compared to the 1982 Freedom 28 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1982 Freedom 28 is 2.18m longer than the Hunter 212. The 1982 Freedom 28 displaces approximately 267% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 212 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 21.04 and 16.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Freedom 28, with an SA/D of 16.02 and 29.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 212 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 212 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 10.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 1.03). The 1982 Freedom 28 has a comfort ratio of 17.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.84. The ballast ratios are 24.7% for the Hunter 212 and 36.4% for the 1982 Freedom 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 212 provides 3 berths in 1 cabin with 15L of water capacity and unspecified fuel capacity. The 1982 Freedom 28 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Freedom 28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 212 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1982 Freedom 28 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 212 · 1982 Freedom 28