2003 Hunter 41 AC vs Bavaria 42 — Comparison

2003 Hunter 41 AC
VS
Bavaria 42Bavaria 42

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2003 Hunter 41 ACBavaria 42
General
ManufacturerHunterBavaria
Year2003–20072003–2008
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerGlenn HendersonJ&J Design
Dimensions
LOA12.50 m (41.0 ft)12.99 m (42.6 ft)
LWL10.82 m (35.5 ft)11.29 m (37.0 ft)
Beam4.09 m (13.4 ft)4.06 m (13.3 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,072 kg (20,000 lbs)9,300 kg (20,503 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)2,900 kg (6,393 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area73.2 m² (788 ft²)79.0 m² (850 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeShoal draftFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Water Capacity303 L (80.0 gal)350 L (92.5 gal)
Accommodation
Berths88
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2003 Hunter 41 AC
17.10
Bavaria 42
18.15
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2003 Hunter 41 AC
35.00
Bavaria 42
31.18
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2003 Hunter 41 AC
0.79
Bavaria 42
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2003 Hunter 41 AC
16.65
Bavaria 42
15.87

Detailed Comparison

The 2003 Hunter 41 AC and Bavaria 42 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the Bavaria 42 is a 2000s offering from Bavaria from Germany. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC was penned by Glenn Henderson. The Bavaria 42 was designed by J&J Design.

In terms of size, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC measures 12.50m (41.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.09m, compared to the Bavaria 42 at 12.99m (42.6ft) with a 4.06m beam. The Bavaria 42 is 0.49m longer than the 2003 Hunter 41 AC. The Bavaria 42 displaces approximately 3% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.10 and 73.2 m² of sail area. The Bavaria 42, with an SA/D of 18.15 and 79.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Bavaria 42 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The Bavaria 42 has a comfort ratio of 15.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 35.0% for the 2003 Hunter 41 AC and 31.2% for the Bavaria 42, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The Bavaria 42 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 350L water and 200L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2003 Hunter 41 AC is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Bavaria 42 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2003 Hunter 41 AC · Bavaria 42