2003 Hunter 41 AC vs Catalina 425 — Comparison
Catalina 425
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2003 Hunter 41 AC | Catalina 425 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hunter | Catalina |
| Year | 2003–2007 | 2013 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Glenn Henderson | Gerry Douglas |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 12.50 m (41.0 ft) | 12.95 m (42.5 ft) |
| LWL | 10.82 m (35.5 ft) | 11.28 m (37.0 ft) |
| Beam | 4.09 m (13.4 ft) | 3.96 m (13.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) | 2.06 m (6.8 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 9,072 kg (20,000 lbs) | 9,616 kg (21,200 lbs) |
| Ballast | 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) | 3,719 kg (8,199 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 73.2 m² (788 ft²) | 78.0 m² (840 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Shoal draft | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 40 HP | 55 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 151 L (39.9 gal) | 152 L (40.2 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 303 L (80.0 gal) | 322 L (85.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 8 | 7 |
| Cabins | 3 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2003 Hunter 41 AC and Catalina 425 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the Catalina 425 is a modern offering from Catalina from USA. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC was penned by Glenn Henderson. The Catalina 425 was designed by Gerry Douglas.
In terms of size, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC measures 12.50m (41.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.09m, compared to the Catalina 425 at 12.95m (42.5ft) with a 3.96m beam. The Catalina 425 is 0.45m longer than the 2003 Hunter 41 AC. The Catalina 425 displaces approximately 6% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.10 and 73.2 m² of sail area. The Catalina 425, with an SA/D of 17.52 and 78.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Catalina 425 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The Catalina 425 has a comfort ratio of 17.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 35.0% for the 2003 Hunter 41 AC and 38.7% for the Catalina 425, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The Catalina 425 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 322L water and 152L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The Catalina 425 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Catalina 425 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 2003 Hunter 41 AC offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 2003 Hunter 41 AC · Catalina 425