2003 Nautor Swan 50 vs 2007 Moody 46 — Comparison

2003 Nautor Swan 50
VS
2007 Moody 46

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2003 Nautor Swan 502007 Moody 46
General
ManufacturerNautor SwanMoody
Year2003–20082007–2014
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFinlandGermany
DesignerGerman FrersBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA15.24 m (50.0 ft)13.95 m (45.8 ft)
LWL12.80 m (42.0 ft)12.30 m (40.4 ft)
Beam4.30 m (14.1 ft)4.49 m (14.7 ft)
Draft2.55 m (8.4 ft)1.89 m (6.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement14,500 kg (31,967 lbs)14,500 kg (31,967 lbs)
Ballast5,700 kg (12,566 lbs)5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area108.0 m² (1,163 ft²)96.0 m² (1,033 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine75 HP75 HP
Fuel Capacity280 L (74.0 gal)300 L (79.3 gal)
Water Capacity480 L (126.8 gal)500 L (132.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths78
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2003 Nautor Swan 50
18.45
2007 Moody 46
16.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2003 Nautor Swan 50
39.31
2007 Moody 46
35.86
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2003 Nautor Swan 50
0.71
2007 Moody 46
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2003 Nautor Swan 50
17.43
2007 Moody 46
18.40

Detailed Comparison

The 2003 Nautor Swan 50 and 2007 Moody 46 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2003 Nautor Swan 50 is a 2000s design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the 2007 Moody 46 is a 2000s offering from Moody from Germany. The 2003 Nautor Swan 50 was penned by German Frers. The 2007 Moody 46 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 2003 Nautor Swan 50 measures 15.24m (50.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.30m, compared to the 2007 Moody 46 at 13.95m (45.8ft) with a 4.49m beam. The 2003 Nautor Swan 50 is 1.29m longer than the 2007 Moody 46.

Looking at performance, the 2003 Nautor Swan 50 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.45 and 108.0 m² of sail area. The 2007 Moody 46, with an SA/D of 16.40 and 96.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2003 Nautor Swan 50 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2003 Nautor Swan 50 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 2007 Moody 46 has a comfort ratio of 18.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 39.3% for the 2003 Nautor Swan 50 and 35.9% for the 2007 Moody 46, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2003 Nautor Swan 50 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 480L of water capacity and 280L of fuel. The 2007 Moody 46 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 500L water and 300L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2007 Moody 46 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2003 Nautor Swan 50 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2007 Moody 46 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2003 Nautor Swan 50 · 2007 Moody 46