Hanse 370 vs 1983 Pearson 31 — Comparison
1983 Pearson 31
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hanse 370 | 1983 Pearson 31 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hanse | Pearson |
| Year | 2004–2008 | 1983–1990 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Germany | USA |
| Designer | judel/vrolijk & co | William Shaw |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 11.40 m (37.4 ft) | 9.45 m (31.0 ft) |
| LWL | 10.10 m (33.1 ft) | 7.77 m (25.5 ft) |
| Beam | 3.63 m (11.9 ft) | 3.10 m (10.2 ft) |
| Draft | 1.90 m (6.2 ft) | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 6,800 kg (14,991 lbs) | 4,309 kg (9,500 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,100 kg (4,630 lbs) | 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 60.0 m² (646 ft²) | 40.0 m² (431 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 29 HP | 18 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 130 L (34.3 gal) | 68 L (18.0 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 250 L (66.0 gal) | 114 L (30.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hanse 370 and 1983 Pearson 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 370 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1983 Pearson 31 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The Hanse 370 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1983 Pearson 31 was designed by William Shaw.
In terms of size, the Hanse 370 measures 11.40m (37.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.63m, compared to the 1983 Pearson 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.10m beam. The Hanse 370 is 1.95m longer than the 1983 Pearson 31. The Hanse 370 displaces approximately 58% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hanse 370 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.98 and 60.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Pearson 31, with an SA/D of 15.35 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 370 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hanse 370 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1983 Pearson 31 has a comfort ratio of 21.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 30.9% for the Hanse 370 and 42.1% for the 1983 Pearson 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hanse 370 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 130L of fuel. The 1983 Pearson 31 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1983 Pearson 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hanse 370 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Hanse 370 · 1983 Pearson 31