2004 Hunter 466 vs Bavaria C42 — Comparison

2004 Hunter 4662004 Hunter 466
VS
Bavaria C42Bavaria C42

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2004 Hunter 466Bavaria C42
General
ManufacturerHunterBavaria
Year2004–20082018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerGlenn Hendersoncossutti yacht design
Dimensions
LOA14.17 m (46.5 ft)12.88 m (42.3 ft)
LWL12.50 m (41.0 ft)11.25 m (36.9 ft)
Beam4.37 m (14.3 ft)4.09 m (13.4 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement12,247 kg (27,000 lbs)8,900 kg (19,621 lbs)
Ballast4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)2,750 kg (6,063 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area90.5 m² (974 ft²)76.0 m² (818 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP45 HP
Fuel Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Water Capacity379 L (100.1 gal)340 L (89.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths88
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2004 Hunter 466
17.30
Bavaria C42
17.98
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2004 Hunter 466
33.33
Bavaria C42
30.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2004 Hunter 466
0.76
Bavaria C42
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2004 Hunter 466
15.61
Bavaria C42
15.20

Detailed Comparison

The 2004 Hunter 466 and Bavaria C42 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2004 Hunter 466 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the Bavaria C42 is a modern offering from Bavaria from Germany. The 2004 Hunter 466 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The Bavaria C42 was designed by cossutti yacht design.

In terms of size, the 2004 Hunter 466 measures 14.17m (46.5ft) overall with a beam of 4.37m, compared to the Bavaria C42 at 12.88m (42.3ft) with a 4.09m beam. The 2004 Hunter 466 is 1.29m longer than the Bavaria C42. The 2004 Hunter 466 displaces approximately 38% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2004 Hunter 466 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.30 and 90.5 m² of sail area. The Bavaria C42, with an SA/D of 17.98 and 76.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Bavaria C42 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2004 Hunter 466 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 15.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Bavaria C42 has a comfort ratio of 15.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 33.3% for the 2004 Hunter 466 and 30.9% for the Bavaria C42, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2004 Hunter 466 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 379L of water capacity and 189L of fuel. The Bavaria C42 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 340L water and 200L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2004 Hunter 466 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Bavaria C42 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2004 Hunter 466 · Bavaria C42