2005 Hanse 312 vs 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 — Comparison

2005 Hanse 312
VS
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2005 Hanse 3121982 Pacific Seacraft 27
General
ManufacturerHansePacific Seacraft
Year2005–20081982–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
DesignerJudel/VrolijkWilliam Crealock
Dimensions
LOA9.55 m (31.3 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
LWL8.50 m (27.9 ft)6.55 m (21.5 ft)
Beam3.25 m (10.7 ft)2.64 m (8.7 ft)
Draft1.75 m (5.7 ft)1.14 m (3.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,300 kg (9,480 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast1,400 kg (3,086 lbs)1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area47.0 m² (506 ft²)30.5 m² (328 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity55 L (14.5 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths54
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2005 Hanse 312
18.06
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
14.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2005 Hanse 312
32.56
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2005 Hanse 312
0.80
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2005 Hanse 312
17.69
1982 Pacific Seacraft 27
26.91

Detailed Comparison

The 2005 Hanse 312 and 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2005 Hanse 312 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 2005 Hanse 312 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the 2005 Hanse 312 measures 9.55m (31.3ft) overall with a beam of 3.25m, compared to the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.64m beam. The 2005 Hanse 312 is 1.32m longer than the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27. The 2005 Hanse 312 displaces approximately 35% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2005 Hanse 312 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.06 and 47.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27, with an SA/D of 14.35 and 30.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2005 Hanse 312 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2005 Hanse 312 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 has a comfort ratio of 26.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 32.6% for the 2005 Hanse 312 and 42.9% for the 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2005 Hanse 312 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 100L of water capacity and 55L of fuel. The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2005 Hanse 312 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2005 Hanse 312 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2005 Hanse 312 · 1982 Pacific Seacraft 27