2005 Hanse 312 vs 1982 Westerly Konsort — Comparison

2005 Hanse 312
VS
1982 Westerly Konsort1982 Westerly Konsort

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2005 Hanse 3121982 Westerly Konsort
General
ManufacturerHanseWesterly
Year2005–20081982–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUK
DesignerJudel/VrolijkEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA9.55 m (31.3 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
LWL8.50 m (27.9 ft)7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam3.25 m (10.7 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.75 m (5.7 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,300 kg (9,480 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast1,400 kg (3,086 lbs)1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area47.0 m² (506 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity55 L (14.5 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2005 Hanse 312
18.06
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2005 Hanse 312
32.56
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2005 Hanse 312
0.80
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2005 Hanse 312
17.69
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75

Detailed Comparison

The 2005 Hanse 312 and 1982 Westerly Konsort represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2005 Hanse 312 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 2005 Hanse 312 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 2005 Hanse 312 measures 9.55m (31.3ft) overall with a beam of 3.25m, compared to the 1982 Westerly Konsort at 9.50m (31.2ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 2005 Hanse 312 is 0.05m longer than the 1982 Westerly Konsort. The 1982 Westerly Konsort displaces approximately 5% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2005 Hanse 312 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.06 and 47.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Westerly Konsort, with an SA/D of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2005 Hanse 312 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2005 Hanse 312 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1982 Westerly Konsort has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 32.6% for the 2005 Hanse 312 and 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2005 Hanse 312 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 100L of water capacity and 55L of fuel. The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2005 Hanse 312 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2005 Hanse 312 · 1982 Westerly Konsort