2005 Hanse 312 vs 1992 Moody 41 — Comparison
1992 Moody 41
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2005 Hanse 312 | 1992 Moody 41 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hanse | Moody |
| Year | 2005–2008 | 1992–1998 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Germany | UK |
| Designer | Judel/Vrolijk | Bill Dixon |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 9.55 m (31.3 ft) | 12.50 m (41.0 ft) |
| LWL | 8.50 m (27.9 ft) | 10.36 m (34.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.25 m (10.7 ft) | 3.86 m (12.7 ft) |
| Draft | 1.75 m (5.7 ft) | 1.70 m (5.6 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 4,300 kg (9,480 lbs) | 9,800 kg (21,605 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,400 kg (3,086 lbs) | 3,800 kg (8,378 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 47.0 m² (506 ft²) | 70.0 m² (754 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 18 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 55 L (14.5 gal) | 180 L (47.6 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 100 L (26.4 gal) | 360 L (95.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 5 | 7 |
| Cabins | 2 | 3 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2005 Hanse 312 and 1992 Moody 41 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2005 Hanse 312 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1992 Moody 41 is a 1990s offering from Moody from UK. The 2005 Hanse 312 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1992 Moody 41 was designed by Bill Dixon.
In terms of size, the 2005 Hanse 312 measures 9.55m (31.3ft) overall with a beam of 3.25m, compared to the 1992 Moody 41 at 12.50m (41.0ft) with a 3.86m beam. The 1992 Moody 41 is 2.95m longer than the 2005 Hanse 312. The 1992 Moody 41 displaces approximately 128% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2005 Hanse 312 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.06 and 47.0 m² of sail area. The 1992 Moody 41, with an SA/D of 15.53 and 70.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2005 Hanse 312 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2005 Hanse 312 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1992 Moody 41 has a comfort ratio of 20.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 32.6% for the 2005 Hanse 312 and 38.8% for the 1992 Moody 41, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2005 Hanse 312 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 100L of water capacity and 55L of fuel. The 1992 Moody 41 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 360L water and 180L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1992 Moody 41 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2005 Hanse 312 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1992 Moody 41 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 2005 Hanse 312 · 1992 Moody 41