2005 Hanse 312 vs 2010 Elan 340 — Comparison

2005 Hanse 312
VS
2010 Elan 3402010 Elan 340

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2005 Hanse 3122010 Elan 340
General
ManufacturerHanseElan
Year2005–20082010–2014
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanySlovenia
DesignerJudel/VrolijkRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA9.55 m (31.3 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL8.50 m (27.9 ft)9.00 m (29.5 ft)
Beam3.25 m (10.7 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.75 m (5.7 ft)1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,300 kg (9,480 lbs)5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)
Ballast1,400 kg (3,086 lbs)1,750 kg (3,858 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area47.0 m² (506 ft²)55.0 m² (592 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity55 L (14.5 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)160 L (42.3 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2005 Hanse 312
18.06
2010 Elan 340
17.31
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2005 Hanse 312
32.56
2010 Elan 340
30.17
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2005 Hanse 312
0.80
2010 Elan 340
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2005 Hanse 312
17.69
2010 Elan 340
19.73

Detailed Comparison

The 2005 Hanse 312 and 2010 Elan 340 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2005 Hanse 312 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 2010 Elan 340 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 2005 Hanse 312 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 2010 Elan 340 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 2005 Hanse 312 measures 9.55m (31.3ft) overall with a beam of 3.25m, compared to the 2010 Elan 340 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 2010 Elan 340 is 0.81m longer than the 2005 Hanse 312. The 2010 Elan 340 displaces approximately 35% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2005 Hanse 312 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.06 and 47.0 m² of sail area. The 2010 Elan 340, with an SA/D of 17.31 and 55.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2005 Hanse 312 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2005 Hanse 312 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 2010 Elan 340 has a comfort ratio of 19.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 32.6% for the 2005 Hanse 312 and 30.2% for the 2010 Elan 340, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2005 Hanse 312 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 100L of water capacity and 55L of fuel. The 2010 Elan 340 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 160L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2010 Elan 340 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2005 Hanse 312 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2010 Elan 340 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2005 Hanse 312 · 2010 Elan 340