Hanse 320 vs 1976 C&C 33 — Comparison
Hanse 320
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hanse 320 | 1976 C&C 33 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hanse | C&C Yachts |
| Year | 2005–2010 | 1976–1982 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Germany | Canada |
| Designer | judel/vrolijk & co | Cuthbertson & Cassian |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 9.92 m (32.5 ft) | 10.06 m (33.0 ft) |
| LWL | 8.80 m (28.9 ft) | 8.23 m (27.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.28 m (10.8 ft) | 3.35 m (11.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.70 m (5.6 ft) | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 4,600 kg (10,141 lbs) | 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,400 kg (3,086 lbs) | 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 46.0 m² (495 ft²) | 42.0 m² (452 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 18 HP | 15 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 90 L (23.8 gal) | 57 L (15.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 150 L (39.6 gal) | 95 L (25.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hanse 320 and 1976 C&C 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 320 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1976 C&C 33 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The Hanse 320 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1976 C&C 33 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.
In terms of size, the Hanse 320 measures 9.92m (32.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 1976 C&C 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1976 C&C 33 is 0.14m longer than the Hanse 320. The Hanse 320 displaces approximately 1% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hanse 320 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of sail area. The 1976 C&C 33, with an SA/D of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 320 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hanse 320 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1976 C&C 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 30.4% for the Hanse 320 and 45.0% for the 1976 C&C 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hanse 320 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 90L of fuel. The 1976 C&C 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1976 C&C 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hanse 320 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Hanse 320 · 1976 C&C 33