2005 Najad 460 vs 1996 Moody 45 — Comparison
1996 Moody 45
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2005 Najad 460 | 1996 Moody 45 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Najad | Moody |
| Year | 2005–2013 | 1996–2002 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Sweden | UK |
| Designer | Judel/Vrolijk | Bill Dixon |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 14.10 m (46.3 ft) | 13.72 m (45.0 ft) |
| LWL | 11.80 m (38.7 ft) | 11.50 m (37.7 ft) |
| Beam | 4.20 m (13.8 ft) | 4.22 m (13.8 ft) |
| Draft | 2.15 m (7.1 ft) | 1.80 m (5.9 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 13,500 kg (29,762 lbs) | 12,500 kg (27,558 lbs) |
| Ballast | 5,200 kg (11,464 lbs) | 4,900 kg (10,803 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 97.0 m² (1,044 ft²) | 85.0 m² (915 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 100 HP | 55 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 320 L (84.5 gal) | 250 L (66.0 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 560 L (147.9 gal) | 450 L (118.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 7 | 8 |
| Cabins | 3 | 3 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2005 Najad 460 and 1996 Moody 45 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2005 Najad 460 is a 2000s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 1996 Moody 45 is a 1990s offering from Moody from UK. The 2005 Najad 460 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1996 Moody 45 was designed by Bill Dixon.
In terms of size, the 2005 Najad 460 measures 14.10m (46.3ft) overall with a beam of 4.20m, compared to the 1996 Moody 45 at 13.72m (45.0ft) with a 4.22m beam. The 2005 Najad 460 is 0.38m longer than the 1996 Moody 45. The 2005 Najad 460 displaces approximately 8% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2005 Najad 460 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.38 and 97.0 m² of sail area. The 1996 Moody 45, with an SA/D of 16.03 and 85.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2005 Najad 460 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2005 Najad 460 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 1996 Moody 45 has a comfort ratio of 19.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 38.5% for the 2005 Najad 460 and 39.2% for the 1996 Moody 45, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2005 Najad 460 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 560L of water capacity and 320L of fuel. The 1996 Moody 45 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 450L water and 250L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 2005 Najad 460 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2005 Najad 460 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1996 Moody 45 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 2005 Najad 460 · 1996 Moody 45