2005 Najad 460 vs 2013 Moody 54 — Comparison

2005 Najad 460
VS
2013 Moody 542013 Moody 54

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2005 Najad 4602013 Moody 54
General
ManufacturerNajadMoody
Year2005–20132013–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenGermany
DesignerJudel/VrolijkBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA14.10 m (46.3 ft)16.18 m (53.1 ft)
LWL11.80 m (38.7 ft)14.50 m (47.6 ft)
Beam4.20 m (13.8 ft)4.90 m (16.1 ft)
Draft2.15 m (7.1 ft)2.15 m (7.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement13,500 kg (29,762 lbs)21,000 kg (46,297 lbs)
Ballast5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)7,500 kg (16,535 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area97.0 m² (1,044 ft²)125.0 m² (1,346 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine100 HP110 HP
Fuel Capacity320 L (84.5 gal)450 L (118.9 gal)
Water Capacity560 L (147.9 gal)700 L (184.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths78
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2005 Najad 460
17.38
2013 Moody 54
16.68
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2005 Najad 460
38.52
2013 Moody 54
35.71
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2005 Najad 460
0.71
2013 Moody 54
0.71
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2005 Najad 460
19.66
2013 Moody 54
17.25

Detailed Comparison

The 2005 Najad 460 and 2013 Moody 54 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2005 Najad 460 is a 2000s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 2013 Moody 54 is a modern offering from Moody from Germany. The 2005 Najad 460 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 2013 Moody 54 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 2005 Najad 460 measures 14.10m (46.3ft) overall with a beam of 4.20m, compared to the 2013 Moody 54 at 16.18m (53.1ft) with a 4.90m beam. The 2013 Moody 54 is 2.08m longer than the 2005 Najad 460. The 2013 Moody 54 displaces approximately 56% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2005 Najad 460 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.38 and 97.0 m² of sail area. The 2013 Moody 54, with an SA/D of 16.68 and 125.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2005 Najad 460 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2005 Najad 460 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 2013 Moody 54 has a comfort ratio of 17.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 38.5% for the 2005 Najad 460 and 35.7% for the 2013 Moody 54, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2005 Najad 460 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 560L of water capacity and 320L of fuel. The 2013 Moody 54 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 700L water and 450L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2005 Najad 460 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2005 Najad 460 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2013 Moody 54 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2005 Najad 460 · 2013 Moody 54