2005 Sabre 426 vs 1998 Feeling 44 — Comparison

2005 Sabre 4262005 Sabre 426
VS
1998 Feeling 44

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2005 Sabre 4261998 Feeling 44
General
ManufacturerSabreFeeling
Year2005–20121998–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerJim TaylorPhilippe Harlé / Mortain & Mavrikios
Dimensions
LOA12.95 m (42.5 ft)13.41 m (44.0 ft)
LWL10.67 m (35.0 ft)11.50 m (37.7 ft)
Beam3.96 m (13.0 ft)4.10 m (13.5 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)1.90 m (6.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,979 kg (22,000 lbs)10,500 kg (23,149 lbs)
Ballast3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)4,000 kg (8,818 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area77.5 m² (834 ft²)82.0 m² (883 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Water Capacity303 L (80.0 gal)400 L (105.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths78
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2005 Sabre 426
16.99
1998 Feeling 44
17.37
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2005 Sabre 426
38.64
1998 Feeling 44
38.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2005 Sabre 426
0.74
1998 Feeling 44
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2005 Sabre 426
19.02
1998 Feeling 44
16.90

Detailed Comparison

The 2005 Sabre 426 and 1998 Feeling 44 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2005 Sabre 426 is a 2000s design by Sabre from USA, while the 1998 Feeling 44 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 2005 Sabre 426 was penned by Jim Taylor. The 1998 Feeling 44 was designed by Philippe Harlé / Mortain & Mavrikios.

In terms of size, the 2005 Sabre 426 measures 12.95m (42.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.96m, compared to the 1998 Feeling 44 at 13.41m (44.0ft) with a 4.10m beam. The 1998 Feeling 44 is 0.46m longer than the 2005 Sabre 426. The 1998 Feeling 44 displaces approximately 5% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2005 Sabre 426 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.99 and 77.5 m² of sail area. The 1998 Feeling 44, with an SA/D of 17.37 and 82.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1998 Feeling 44 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2005 Sabre 426 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1998 Feeling 44 has a comfort ratio of 16.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 38.6% for the 2005 Sabre 426 and 38.1% for the 1998 Feeling 44, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2005 Sabre 426 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 189L of fuel. The 1998 Feeling 44 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 400L water and 200L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2005 Sabre 426 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1998 Feeling 44 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1998 Feeling 44 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2005 Sabre 426 · 1998 Feeling 44