2006 Catalina 375 vs 1983 Pearson 31 — Comparison

2006 Catalina 3752006 Catalina 375
VS
1983 Pearson 311983 Pearson 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2006 Catalina 3751983 Pearson 31
General
ManufacturerCatalinaPearson
Year2006–20131983–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA11.58 m (38.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL10.06 m (33.0 ft)7.77 m (25.5 ft)
Beam3.72 m (12.2 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,711 kg (17,000 lbs)4,309 kg (9,500 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area62.4 m² (672 ft²)40.0 m² (431 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity227 L (60.0 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2006 Catalina 375
16.24
1983 Pearson 31
15.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2006 Catalina 375
41.17
1983 Pearson 31
42.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2006 Catalina 375
0.75
1983 Pearson 31
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2006 Catalina 375
18.62
1983 Pearson 31
21.43

Detailed Comparison

The 2006 Catalina 375 and 1983 Pearson 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2006 Catalina 375 is a 2000s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1983 Pearson 31 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 2006 Catalina 375 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1983 Pearson 31 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 2006 Catalina 375 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the 1983 Pearson 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 2006 Catalina 375 is 2.13m longer than the 1983 Pearson 31. The 2006 Catalina 375 displaces approximately 79% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2006 Catalina 375 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.24 and 62.4 m² of sail area. The 1983 Pearson 31, with an SA/D of 15.35 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2006 Catalina 375 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2006 Catalina 375 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1983 Pearson 31 has a comfort ratio of 21.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the 2006 Catalina 375 and 42.1% for the 1983 Pearson 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2006 Catalina 375 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1983 Pearson 31 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Pearson 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2006 Catalina 375 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2006 Catalina 375 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2006 Catalina 375 · 1983 Pearson 31