Hanse 342 vs 1971 C&C 27 — Comparison
Hanse 342
1971 C&C 27
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hanse 342 | 1971 C&C 27 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hanse | C&C Yachts |
| Year | 2006–2010 | 1971–1975 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Germany | Canada |
| Designer | judel/vrolijk & co | Cuthbertson & Cassian |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.30 m (33.8 ft) | 8.23 m (27.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.20 m (30.2 ft) | 6.55 m (21.5 ft) |
| Beam | 3.40 m (11.2 ft) | 2.74 m (9.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.80 m (5.9 ft) | 1.37 m (4.5 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,300 kg (11,684 lbs) | 2,495 kg (5,501 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,650 kg (3,638 lbs) | 1,043 kg (2,299 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 52.0 m² (560 ft²) | 31.0 m² (334 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 21 HP | 10 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 100 L (26.4 gal) | 38 L (10.0 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 180 L (47.6 gal) | 57 L (15.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 5 |
| Cabins | 2 | 1 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hanse 342 and 1971 C&C 27 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 342 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1971 C&C 27 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The Hanse 342 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1971 C&C 27 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.
In terms of size, the Hanse 342 measures 10.30m (33.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1971 C&C 27 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.74m beam. The Hanse 342 is 2.07m longer than the 1971 C&C 27. The Hanse 342 displaces approximately 112% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hanse 342 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The 1971 C&C 27, with an SA/D of 17.13 and 31.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 342 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hanse 342 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1971 C&C 27 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 31.1% for the Hanse 342 and 41.8% for the 1971 C&C 27, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hanse 342 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 1971 C&C 27 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1971 C&C 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hanse 342 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The Hanse 342 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Hanse 342 · 1971 C&C 27