Hanse 342 vs 1982 Freedom 28 — Comparison

Hanse 342Hanse 342
VS
1982 Freedom 281982 Freedom 28

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 3421982 Freedom 28
General
ManufacturerHanseFreedom
Year2006–20101982–1988
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coGarry Hoyt
Dimensions
LOA10.30 m (33.8 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL9.20 m (30.2 ft)7.01 m (23.0 ft)
Beam3.40 m (11.2 ft)2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.14 m (3.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,300 kg (11,684 lbs)2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Ballast1,650 kg (3,638 lbs)907 kg (2,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area52.0 m² (560 ft²)29.0 m² (312 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP10 HP
Fuel Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity180 L (47.6 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 342
17.38
1982 Freedom 28
16.02
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 342
31.13
1982 Freedom 28
36.35
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 342
0.78
1982 Freedom 28
0.84
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 342
17.57
1982 Freedom 28
17.13

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 342 and 1982 Freedom 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 342 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1982 Freedom 28 is a 1980s offering from Freedom from USA. The Hanse 342 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1982 Freedom 28 was designed by Garry Hoyt.

In terms of size, the Hanse 342 measures 10.30m (33.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1982 Freedom 28 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The Hanse 342 is 1.77m longer than the 1982 Freedom 28. The Hanse 342 displaces approximately 112% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 342 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Freedom 28, with an SA/D of 16.02 and 29.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 342 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 342 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1982 Freedom 28 has a comfort ratio of 17.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.84. The ballast ratios are 31.1% for the Hanse 342 and 36.4% for the 1982 Freedom 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 342 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 1982 Freedom 28 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hanse 342 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 342 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 342 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 342 · 1982 Freedom 28