Hanse 342 vs 2015 ClubSwan 36 — Comparison
Hanse 342
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hanse 342 | 2015 ClubSwan 36 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hanse | Nautor Swan |
| Year | 2006–2010 | 2015 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Germany | Finland |
| Designer | judel/vrolijk & co | Juan Kouyoumdjian |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.30 m (33.8 ft) | 11.00 m (36.1 ft) |
| LWL | 9.20 m (30.2 ft) | 9.90 m (32.5 ft) |
| Beam | 3.40 m (11.2 ft) | 3.30 m (10.8 ft) |
| Draft | 1.80 m (5.9 ft) | 2.30 m (7.5 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,300 kg (11,684 lbs) | 4,800 kg (10,582 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,650 kg (3,638 lbs) | 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 52.0 m² (560 ft²) | 65.0 m² (700 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 21 HP | 15 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 100 L (26.4 gal) | 40 L (10.6 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 180 L (47.6 gal) | 60 L (15.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 4 |
| Cabins | 2 | 1 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hanse 342 and 2015 ClubSwan 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 342 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 2015 ClubSwan 36 is a modern offering from Nautor Swan from Finland. The Hanse 342 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 was designed by Juan Kouyoumdjian.
In terms of size, the Hanse 342 measures 10.30m (33.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 2015 ClubSwan 36 at 11.00m (36.1ft) with a 3.30m beam. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 is 0.70m longer than the Hanse 342. The Hanse 342 displaces approximately 10% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hanse 342 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The 2015 ClubSwan 36, with an SA/D of 23.21 and 65.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hanse 342 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 2015 ClubSwan 36 has a comfort ratio of 14.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 31.1% for the Hanse 342 and 35.4% for the 2015 ClubSwan 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hanse 342 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 60L water and 40L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The Hanse 342 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2015 ClubSwan 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The Hanse 342 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Hanse 342 · 2015 ClubSwan 36