2007 Moody 46 vs 1998 Feeling 44 — Comparison

2007 Moody 46
VS
1998 Feeling 44

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2007 Moody 461998 Feeling 44
General
ManufacturerMoodyFeeling
Year2007–20141998–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyFrance
DesignerBill DixonPhilippe Harlé / Mortain & Mavrikios
Dimensions
LOA13.95 m (45.8 ft)13.41 m (44.0 ft)
LWL12.30 m (40.4 ft)11.50 m (37.7 ft)
Beam4.49 m (14.7 ft)4.10 m (13.5 ft)
Draft1.89 m (6.2 ft)1.90 m (6.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement14,500 kg (31,967 lbs)10,500 kg (23,149 lbs)
Ballast5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)4,000 kg (8,818 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area96.0 m² (1,033 ft²)82.0 m² (883 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine75 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity300 L (79.3 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Water Capacity500 L (132.1 gal)400 L (105.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths88
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2007 Moody 46
16.40
1998 Feeling 44
17.37
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2007 Moody 46
35.86
1998 Feeling 44
38.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2007 Moody 46
0.74
1998 Feeling 44
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2007 Moody 46
18.40
1998 Feeling 44
16.90

Detailed Comparison

The 2007 Moody 46 and 1998 Feeling 44 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2007 Moody 46 is a 2000s design by Moody from Germany, while the 1998 Feeling 44 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 2007 Moody 46 was penned by Bill Dixon. The 1998 Feeling 44 was designed by Philippe Harlé / Mortain & Mavrikios.

In terms of size, the 2007 Moody 46 measures 13.95m (45.8ft) overall with a beam of 4.49m, compared to the 1998 Feeling 44 at 13.41m (44.0ft) with a 4.10m beam. The 2007 Moody 46 is 0.54m longer than the 1998 Feeling 44. The 2007 Moody 46 displaces approximately 38% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2007 Moody 46 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.40 and 96.0 m² of sail area. The 1998 Feeling 44, with an SA/D of 17.37 and 82.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1998 Feeling 44 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2007 Moody 46 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1998 Feeling 44 has a comfort ratio of 16.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 35.9% for the 2007 Moody 46 and 38.1% for the 1998 Feeling 44, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2007 Moody 46 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 500L of water capacity and 300L of fuel. The 1998 Feeling 44 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 400L water and 200L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2007 Moody 46 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1998 Feeling 44 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2007 Moody 46 · 1998 Feeling 44