2008 Oyster 56 vs 1996 MacGregor 65 — Comparison

2008 Oyster 562008 Oyster 56
VS
1996 MacGregor 651996 MacGregor 65

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2008 Oyster 561996 MacGregor 65
General
ManufacturerOysterMacGregor
Year2008–20151996–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUnited KingdomUSA
DesignerRob HumphreysRoger MacGregor
Dimensions
LOA17.10 m (56.1 ft)19.81 m (65.0 ft)
LWL14.30 m (46.9 ft)16.15 m (53.0 ft)
Beam4.72 m (15.5 ft)5.18 m (17.0 ft)
Draft2.35 m (7.7 ft)1.22 m (4.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement21,000 kg (46,297 lbs)15,876 kg (35,001 lbs)
Ballast7,800 kg (17,196 lbs)5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area128.0 m² (1,378 ft²)120.0 m² (1,292 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinCenterboard
Engine & Tanks
Engine150 HP75 HP
Fuel Capacity500 L (132.1 gal)380 L (100.4 gal)
Water Capacity850 L (224.5 gal)760 L (200.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths88
Cabins44

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2008 Oyster 56
17.08
1996 MacGregor 65
19.30
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2008 Oyster 56
37.14
1996 MacGregor 65
34.28
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2008 Oyster 56
0.69
1996 MacGregor 65
0.83
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2008 Oyster 56
17.81
1996 MacGregor 65
9.17

Detailed Comparison

The 2008 Oyster 56 and 1996 MacGregor 65 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2008 Oyster 56 is a 2000s design by Oyster from United Kingdom, while the 1996 MacGregor 65 is a 1990s offering from MacGregor from USA. The 2008 Oyster 56 was penned by Rob Humphreys. The 1996 MacGregor 65 was designed by Roger MacGregor.

In terms of size, the 2008 Oyster 56 measures 17.10m (56.1ft) overall with a beam of 4.72m, compared to the 1996 MacGregor 65 at 19.81m (65.0ft) with a 5.18m beam. The 1996 MacGregor 65 is 2.71m longer than the 2008 Oyster 56. The 2008 Oyster 56 displaces approximately 32% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2008 Oyster 56 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.08 and 128.0 m² of sail area. The 1996 MacGregor 65, with an SA/D of 19.30 and 120.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1996 MacGregor 65 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2008 Oyster 56 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.69). The 1996 MacGregor 65 has a comfort ratio of 9.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.83. The ballast ratios are 37.1% for the 2008 Oyster 56 and 34.3% for the 1996 MacGregor 65, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2008 Oyster 56 provides 8 berths in 4 cabins with 850L of water capacity and 500L of fuel. The 1996 MacGregor 65 offers 8 berths in 4 cabins with 760L water and 380L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2008 Oyster 56 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1996 MacGregor 65 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2008 Oyster 56 · 1996 MacGregor 65