Hanse 375 vs 1984 Pearson 34 — Comparison

Hanse 375
VS
1984 Pearson 341984 Pearson 34

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 3751984 Pearson 34
General
ManufacturerHansePearson
Year2009–20151984–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA11.35 m (37.2 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL10.05 m (33.0 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam3.65 m (12.0 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.90 m (6.2 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,000 kg (15,432 lbs)5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Ballast2,150 kg (4,740 lbs)2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area62.0 m² (667 ft²)46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine29 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity130 L (34.3 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)152 L (40.2 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 375
17.21
1984 Pearson 34
15.11
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 375
30.71
1984 Pearson 34
41.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 375
0.76
1984 Pearson 34
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 375
17.59
1984 Pearson 34
20.28

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 375 and 1984 Pearson 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 375 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1984 Pearson 34 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The Hanse 375 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1984 Pearson 34 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the Hanse 375 measures 11.35m (37.2ft) overall with a beam of 3.65m, compared to the 1984 Pearson 34 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The Hanse 375 is 0.99m longer than the 1984 Pearson 34. The Hanse 375 displaces approximately 29% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 375 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.21 and 62.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 Pearson 34, with an SA/D of 15.11 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 375 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 375 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1984 Pearson 34 has a comfort ratio of 20.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 30.7% for the Hanse 375 and 41.7% for the 1984 Pearson 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 375 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 130L of fuel. The 1984 Pearson 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 152L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Pearson 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 375 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 375 · 1984 Pearson 34