2010 Dehler 32 vs Hunter 36 — Comparison

2010 Dehler 32
VS
Hunter 36Hunter 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2010 Dehler 32Hunter 36
General
ManufacturerDehlerHunter
Year2010–20171996–2001
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
DesignerJudel/VrolijkGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA9.90 m (32.5 ft)10.82 m (35.5 ft)
LWL8.95 m (29.4 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.16 m (10.4 ft)3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft1.95 m (6.4 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,400 kg (9,700 lbs)5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)
Ballast1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)2,313 kg (5,099 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area53.0 m² (571 ft²)56.0 m² (603 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP27 HP
Fuel Capacity55 L (14.5 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2010 Dehler 32
20.06
Hunter 36
17.43
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2010 Dehler 32
34.09
Hunter 36
39.22
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2010 Dehler 32
0.77
Hunter 36
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2010 Dehler 32
17.12
Hunter 36
17.17

Detailed Comparison

The 2010 Dehler 32 and Hunter 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2010 Dehler 32 is a modern design by Dehler from Germany, while the Hunter 36 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 2010 Dehler 32 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The Hunter 36 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 2010 Dehler 32 measures 9.90m (32.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.16m, compared to the Hunter 36 at 10.82m (35.5ft) with a 3.56m beam. The Hunter 36 is 0.92m longer than the 2010 Dehler 32. The Hunter 36 displaces approximately 34% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2010 Dehler 32 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 20.06 and 53.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 36, with an SA/D of 17.43 and 56.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2010 Dehler 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2010 Dehler 32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The Hunter 36 has a comfort ratio of 17.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 34.1% for the 2010 Dehler 32 and 39.2% for the Hunter 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2010 Dehler 32 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 100L of water capacity and 55L of fuel. The Hunter 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hunter 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 Dehler 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hunter 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2010 Dehler 32 · Hunter 36