2010 Elan 340 vs 1990 Feeling 32 — Comparison
2010 Elan 340
1990 Feeling 32
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2010 Elan 340 | 1990 Feeling 32 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Elan | Feeling |
| Year | 2010–2014 | 1990–1998 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Slovenia | France |
| Designer | Rob Humphreys | Philippe Harlé |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.36 m (34.0 ft) | 9.85 m (32.3 ft) |
| LWL | 9.00 m (29.5 ft) | 8.20 m (26.9 ft) |
| Beam | 3.40 m (11.2 ft) | 3.15 m (10.3 ft) |
| Draft | 1.95 m (6.4 ft) | 1.50 m (4.9 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,800 kg (12,787 lbs) | 4,700 kg (10,362 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,750 kg (3,858 lbs) | 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 55.0 m² (592 ft²) | 40.0 m² (431 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 21 HP | 18 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 80 L (21.1 gal) | 60 L (15.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 160 L (42.3 gal) | 120 L (31.7 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 5 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2010 Elan 340 and 1990 Feeling 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2010 Elan 340 is a modern design by Elan from Slovenia, while the 1990 Feeling 32 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 2010 Elan 340 was penned by Rob Humphreys. The 1990 Feeling 32 was designed by Philippe Harlé.
In terms of size, the 2010 Elan 340 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1990 Feeling 32 at 9.85m (32.3ft) with a 3.15m beam. The 2010 Elan 340 is 0.51m longer than the 1990 Feeling 32. The 2010 Elan 340 displaces approximately 23% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2010 Elan 340 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.31 and 55.0 m² of sail area. The 1990 Feeling 32, with an SA/D of 14.49 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2010 Elan 340 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2010 Elan 340 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1990 Feeling 32 has a comfort ratio of 20.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 30.2% for the 2010 Elan 340 and 36.2% for the 1990 Feeling 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2010 Elan 340 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 160L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1990 Feeling 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 60L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1990 Feeling 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2010 Elan 340 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 2010 Elan 340 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 2010 Elan 340 · 1990 Feeling 32