Hanse 315 vs Hunter 33 — Comparison

Hanse 315
VS
Hunter 33Hunter 33

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 315Hunter 33
General
ManufacturerHanseHunter
Year2010–20161988–1994
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coHunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA9.65 m (31.7 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL8.55 m (28.1 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam3.15 m (10.3 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.65 m (5.4 ft)1.68 m (5.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,200 kg (9,259 lbs)4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast1,200 kg (2,646 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area41.5 m² (447 ft²)48.0 m² (517 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity85 L (22.5 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths46
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 315
16.20
Hunter 33
17.23
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 315
28.57
Hunter 33
38.09
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 315
0.78
Hunter 33
0.80
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 315
17.75
Hunter 33
18.10

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 315 and Hunter 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 315 is a modern design by Hanse from Germany, while the Hunter 33 is a 1980s offering from Hunter from USA. The Hanse 315 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The Hunter 33 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the Hanse 315 measures 9.65m (31.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.15m, compared to the Hunter 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The Hunter 33 is 0.41m longer than the Hanse 315. The Hunter 33 displaces approximately 13% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 315 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.20 and 41.5 m² of sail area. The Hunter 33, with an SA/D of 17.23 and 48.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 315 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The Hunter 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.80. The ballast ratios are 28.6% for the Hanse 315 and 38.1% for the Hunter 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 315 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 120L of water capacity and 85L of fuel. The Hunter 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hunter 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hunter 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 315 · Hunter 33