Hanse 315 vs 2013 Elan 350 — Comparison

Hanse 315
VS
2013 Elan 350

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 3152013 Elan 350
General
ManufacturerHanseElan
Year2010–20162013–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanySlovenia
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA9.65 m (31.7 ft)10.67 m (35.0 ft)
LWL8.55 m (28.1 ft)9.30 m (30.5 ft)
Beam3.15 m (10.3 ft)3.46 m (11.4 ft)
Draft1.65 m (5.4 ft)2.00 m (6.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,200 kg (9,259 lbs)6,100 kg (13,448 lbs)
Ballast1,200 kg (2,646 lbs)1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area41.5 m² (447 ft²)58.0 m² (624 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity85 L (22.5 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths46
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 315
16.20
2013 Elan 350
17.65
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 315
28.57
2013 Elan 350
30.33
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 315
0.78
2013 Elan 350
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 315
17.75
2013 Elan 350
19.02

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 315 and 2013 Elan 350 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 315 is a modern design by Hanse from Germany, while the 2013 Elan 350 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The Hanse 315 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 2013 Elan 350 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the Hanse 315 measures 9.65m (31.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.15m, compared to the 2013 Elan 350 at 10.67m (35.0ft) with a 3.46m beam. The 2013 Elan 350 is 1.02m longer than the Hanse 315. The 2013 Elan 350 displaces approximately 45% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 315 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.20 and 41.5 m² of sail area. The 2013 Elan 350, with an SA/D of 17.65 and 58.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2013 Elan 350 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 315 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 2013 Elan 350 has a comfort ratio of 19.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 28.6% for the Hanse 315 and 30.3% for the 2013 Elan 350, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 315 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 120L of water capacity and 85L of fuel. The 2013 Elan 350 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2013 Elan 350 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Elan 350 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2013 Elan 350 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 315 · 2013 Elan 350