2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 vs 1983 Pearson 31 — Comparison

2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
VS
1983 Pearson 311983 Pearson 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2010 X-Yachts Xc 351983 Pearson 31
General
ManufacturerX-YachtsPearson
Year2010–20161983–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryDenmarkUSA
DesignerNiels JeppesenWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA10.57 m (34.7 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL9.20 m (30.2 ft)7.77 m (25.5 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)4,309 kg (9,500 lbs)
Ballast2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area52.0 m² (560 ft²)40.0 m² (431 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity70 L (18.5 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity140 L (37.0 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
16.37
1983 Pearson 31
15.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
36.21
1983 Pearson 31
42.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
0.75
1983 Pearson 31
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
19.28
1983 Pearson 31
21.43

Detailed Comparison

The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 and 1983 Pearson 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 is a modern design by X-Yachts from Denmark, while the 1983 Pearson 31 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 was penned by Niels Jeppesen. The 1983 Pearson 31 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 measures 10.57m (34.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1983 Pearson 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 is 1.12m longer than the 1983 Pearson 31. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 displaces approximately 35% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.37 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Pearson 31, with an SA/D of 15.35 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1983 Pearson 31 has a comfort ratio of 21.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 36.2% for the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 and 42.1% for the 1983 Pearson 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 140L of water capacity and 70L of fuel. The 1983 Pearson 31 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Pearson 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 · 1983 Pearson 31