2011 J/111 vs 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 — Comparison

2011 J/111
VS
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2011 J/1111988 Pacific Seacraft 31
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsPacific Seacraft
Year20111988–2007
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerAlan JohnstoneWilliam Crealock
Dimensions
LOA11.13 m (36.5 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL9.75 m (32.0 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam3.40 m (11.2 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft2.20 m (7.2 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area71.0 m² (764 ft²)40.5 m² (436 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP25 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2011 J/111
24.71
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
14.09
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2011 J/111
40.90
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
43.63
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2011 J/111
0.80
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
0.71
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2011 J/111
14.54
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
26.02

Detailed Comparison

The 2011 J/111 and 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2011 J/111 is a modern design by J/Boats from USA, while the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 2011 J/111 was penned by Alan Johnstone. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the 2011 J/111 measures 11.13m (36.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 2011 J/111 is 1.68m longer than the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31.

Looking at performance, the 2011 J/111 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 24.71 and 71.0 m² of sail area. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31, with an SA/D of 14.09 and 40.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2011 J/111 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2011 J/111 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 14.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 has a comfort ratio of 26.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 40.9% for the 2011 J/111 and 43.6% for the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2011 J/111 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2011 J/111 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2011 J/111 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2011 J/111 · 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31